Welcome!!!
During last 2 years of nature photography my focus mostly has been making "artistic" images of nature. Since art has no definition I believed of some my creations were "artistic". Interestingly the concept of what is art in nature photography in my mind has also changed and has been changing. When I started nature photography as a passionate hobby 2 years back I bought a few books then on nature photography which were supposed to teach "art of nature photography", "art of wildlife photography" etc. Back then I believed those books indeed taught me the art of nature/wildlife photography. Now, I think they teach how to make beautiful copies of subjects in nature. While I express my inability to exactly define what art in nature photography is, in my mind every work of art is a new creation and is not repeatable. All that is non-repeatable is not art but I think a work of art is indeed non-repeatable.
With this belief of characteristics of work of art in nature photography I think it is realively easy for me show some images which in my mind are not work of art. It is easier to show exclusions while inclusions may be very debatable.
Initially my work of art constituted what I now call beautiful copies of nature.
If u r really CREATIVE PHOTOGRAPHER... U never need some other tool Than Camera to enhance the beatuty of ur Photograph. !! -Pratik Sawant.
With this belief of characteristics of work of art in nature photography I think it is realively easy for me show some images which in my mind are not work of art. It is easier to show exclusions while inclusions may be very debatable.
Initially my work of art constituted what I now call beautiful copies of nature.
If u r really CREATIVE PHOTOGRAPHER... U never need some other tool Than Camera to enhance the beatuty of ur Photograph. !! -Pratik Sawant.